Credit rationing, courts, property rights and public debt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v18i2.749Keywords:
Credit rationing, judicial efficiency, property rights, public debtAbstract
This work presents a model of credit rationing under the effect of judiciary
inefficiency and lack of protection of property rights. We study the credit contracts when deficient judicial performance interacts with lack of property rights protection. The results shows that bank credit will be rationed when judicial efficiency and property rights protection are defficient. Banks are negatively affected by judicial inefficiency because they observe that they cannot be granted by courts of their entire repayment in the case of default.Entrepreneurs are willing to offer less collateral and Banks will demand higher collateral and projects with better returns. In our analysis, while some entrepreneurs are rationed, banks may nd safer to lend the rationed credit to public institutions and the Government in general. But in this scenario of poor institutional quality, the Government might be induced to keep low institutional quality in order to that have available credit from Banks. But this low institutional quality might let the level of public debt to explode until it became unmanageable over time, threatening the macroeconomic stability.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alchian, A. A. (1965). Some economics of property rights. Il politico, pages 816–829.
Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The journal of economic history,
(1):16–27.
Claessens, S. and Laeven, L. (2004). What drives bank competition? some international evidence. Journal of money, credit and banking, pages 563–583. doi: 10.1353/mcb. 2004.0044.
Fried, J. and Howitt, P. (1980). Credit rationing and implicit contract theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12(3):471–487. doi:10.2307/1991722.
Galindo, A., Micco, A., et al. (2004). Creditor protection and financial markets: empirical evidence and implications for latin america. Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta), 89(2):29–37.
Galindo, A. J. and Micco, A. (2001). Creditor protection and financial cycles. IDB Working Paper No. 443.
Galindo, A. J. and Micco, A. (2005). Creditor protection and credit volatility. IDB Working Paper No. 528.
Galindo, A. J. and Micco, A. (2007). Bank credit to small and medium sized enterprises: the role of creditor protection. IDB Working Paper No. 527. doi:10.2139/ssrn.669583.
Hernández, F. and Villagómez, A. (2013). El enigmático sistema bancario mexicano contemporáneo.Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias. doi:10.20430/ete.v81i321. 153.
Hodgman, D. R. (1960). Credit risk and credit rationing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(2):258–278. doi:10.2307/1884253.
Jaffee, D. M. and Russell, T. (1976). Imperfect information, uncertainty, and credit rationing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4):651–666. doi:10.2307/1885327.
Jappelli, T., Pagano, M., and Bianco, M. (2005). Courts and banks: Effects of judicial enforcement on credit markets. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, pages 223–244. doi:10.1353/mcb.2005.0021.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (2001). Law and finance. Springer.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59499-1_3.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., and Zamarripa, G. (2003). Related lending. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(1):231–268. doi:10.1162/00335530360535199.
Laeven, L. and Majnoni, G. (2005). Does judicial efficiency lower the cost of credit? Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7):1791–1812. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06. 036.
Moro, A., Maresch, D., and Ferrando, A. (2018). Creditor protection, judicial enforcement and credit access. The European Journal of Finance, 24(3):250–281. doi:10.1080/ 1351847x.2016.1216871.
Reichlin, P. (1988). Government debt and equity capital in an economy with credit rationing.
Safavian, M. and Sharma, S. (2007). When do creditor rights work?. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(3):484–508. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2007.05.004.
Stiglitz, J. E. and Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American economic review, 71(3):393–410.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PlumX detalle de metricas